In Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U. S. ____ (Jan. 14, 2014), the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated that general or “all-purpose” jurisdiction can be exercised over foreign corporations only “when their affiliations with the State are so ‘continuous and systematic’ as to render them essentially at home in the forum State.” No general jurisdiction lies over a foreign defendant in a suit by foreign plaintiffs for actions outside of the U.S., based solely on its indirect subsidiary’s contacts with a state in which it is neither incorporated nor holds its principal place of business. Posted by Tony Lathrop, Jan 30, 2014.
MemberTony utilizes his experience as a trial attorney and certified mediator to develop strategies seeking optimal trial results and other resolutions in high-stakes matters, and advises clients based on their business objectives and ...
About MVA Litigation Blog
Companies are operating in an increasingly globalized and regulated business environment, facing ever-changing and complicated litigation and regulatory challenges. We provide cutting-edge information regarding developments in federal, North Carolina State, and international litigation, as well as in arbitration, regulatory enforcement, and related business practices.
The latest from MVA Litigation Blog
- Impact of Carroll and Economic Loss Rule on Service Providers in South Carolina
- Forum TBD: 30 Days for Removal to Federal Court, NJ Transit Immunity from Lawsuits in NY and PA – Two Issues the U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide
- Course Correction: U.S. Supreme Court Removed Roadblock for Railroad Construction Project, Requiring Substantial Deference to Agency’s Environmental Impact Analysis Under NEPA
- FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Blocked