In the fourteen years since the 2008 financial crisis, significant actions have been taken by Federal banking agencies to make the largest financial institutions more resilient and less likely to fail and to require planning that would facilitate their orderly resolution, if necessary. These risk mitigation measures are tailored, however, with the most stringent requirements, and highest regulatory expectations, appropriately reserved for the eight U.S. banks designated as posing the greatest risk to financial stability (global systemically important banks, or GSIBs ...
About MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
As government authorities around the world conduct overlapping investigations and bring parallel proceedings in evolving regulatory environments, companies and individuals face challenging regulatory and criminal enforcement dynamics. We provide in-depth analysis and up-to-date information to help our clients navigate these fast-moving areas.
The latest from MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
- A Lighter Supervisory Touch, But Not a Lower Bar: What the 2026 GSIB Regulatory Feedback May Signal for Resolution Planning
- Irreconcilable Differences: Analyzing the Split in the First and Second Circuit Courts of Appeals’ Decisions on National Bank Act Preemption of State Interest-on-Escrow Laws
- CFPB scales back the small business credit data collection rule - but also indicates future expansion is possible
- Farm Credit Administration’s 2026 Priorities Reflect Some Alignment with Federal Banking Regulators, With Continued Focus on Risk Management and System‑Specific Nuances