
James P. McLoughlin, Jr., Neil T. Bloomfield, and Frank E. Schall issued a Client Advisory titled "Timely Disclosure of Investigation Loss Contingencies: The SEC’s Aggressive Enforcement Stance." The Advisory discusses SEC v. RPM International, Inc., No. 16-01803 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 9, 2016), in which the SEC has pushed its aggressive litigation strategy in pursuit of its policy of compelling registrants to accelerate loss contingency disclosures. The SEC filed against RPM International, Inc. and its general counsel, Edward Moore, alleging the failure to disclose a material loss contingency and record an accrual as a result of the filing of a qui tam complaint against RPM and a subsidiary and a resulting Department of Justice investigation. RPM International doubles down on the SEC’s effort to require earlier disclosures of loss contingencies based upon internal evaluations without waiting for the classic internal triggers of a government demand or notice of a pending action by the government. Click to read the full Client Advisory.
- Member
Frank E. Schall is an experienced attorney recognized for his strategic insight and pragmatic approach to white-collar defense, internal investigations, and regulatory enforcement matters. With experience in public service ...
- Member
Jim has dedicated his career to winning civil and criminal cases. He has prosecuted and defended dozens of appeals. Jim advocates for clients in regulatory and criminal investigations and cases conducted by the Department of ...
- Member
Neil regularly represents clients with responses to inquiries by Federal (e.g. CFTC, OCC, FRB, SEC, IRS, DOJ, and various U.S. Attorney's offices and Congressional Commissioners), State (e.g. the North Carolina Attorney General ...
About MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
As government authorities around the world conduct overlapping investigations and bring parallel proceedings in evolving regulatory environments, companies and individuals face challenging regulatory and criminal enforcement dynamics. We provide in-depth analysis and up-to-date information to help our clients navigate these fast-moving areas.
The latest from MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
- A Lighter Supervisory Touch, But Not a Lower Bar: What the 2026 GSIB Regulatory Feedback May Signal for Resolution Planning
- Irreconcilable Differences: Analyzing the Split in the First and Second Circuit Courts of Appeals’ Decisions on National Bank Act Preemption of State Interest-on-Escrow Laws
- CFPB scales back the small business credit data collection rule - but also indicates future expansion is possible
- Farm Credit Administration’s 2026 Priorities Reflect Some Alignment with Federal Banking Regulators, With Continued Focus on Risk Management and System‑Specific Nuances


