
Moore & Van Allen (MVA) Litigation Member Tanisha Palvia and Associate Alli Davidson discuss the Supreme Court decision on the intent standard for False Claims Act violations and explore its implications in their article titled, “SCOTUS clarifies intent requirement for False Claims Act cases” which was published by Westlaw and Reuters on July 6.
Related Materials
SCOTUS clarifies intent requirement for False Claims Act cases
- Member
Tanisha represents individuals and corporations facing white collar criminal prosecutions and governmental enforcement actions. She also manages and conducts internal investigations for various organizations, including ...
About MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
As government authorities around the world conduct overlapping investigations and bring parallel proceedings in evolving regulatory environments, companies and individuals face challenging regulatory and criminal enforcement dynamics. We provide in-depth analysis and up-to-date information to help our clients navigate these fast-moving areas.
The latest from MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
- A Red State Model for Comprehensive AI Laws: Texas Enacts the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act
- MVA Attorneys Co-Author Law360 Article on FDIC Resolution Planning Updates
- CFPB Announces It Will Not Prioritize Enforcement And Supervision Of Its Small Business Lending Data Collection Rule Under The Equal Credit Opportunity Act
- Acting Chairman Uyeda Suggests Revisiting the Role of State Securities Regulators in Connection with Mid-size Investment Advisers and Securities Registration